TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics72% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock EP2C602-4L/D16  (all builds)
Memory124.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140116
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 19 '18 at 14:33
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPUSocket, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 173
58% 105 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 632
58% 483 Pts
64-Core 1,602
99% 1,602 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 59.2%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 392.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72% Very good
Lighting 87.9
Reflection 90.9
Parallax 80.5
72% 86.5 fps
MRender 88.8
Gravity 86.9
Splatting 90.1
73% 88.6 fps
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 72%
 Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 950GB
740GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 833 828 836 849 851 850 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,042
Write 833
Mixed 588
SusWrite 841
185% 826 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 42
142% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 240
181% 241 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 148%
 Great: 183%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
390GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1946 1982 2004 2030 2030 2032 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 1,967
Write 1,667
Mixed 1,322
SusWrite 2004
391% 1,740 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 49.5
175% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 614
DQ Write 509
DQ Mixed 559
419% 561 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑
This bench: 280%
 Great: 393%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70BH0- 128GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 34.2
106% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.7
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 87% ↑
This bench: 90.3%
 Great: 112%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical EP2C602-4L/D16 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples14x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples14x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples6x
GPU
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples5x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples4x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples4x
SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung  $170Bench 322%, 93,447 samples5x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples4x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung  $92Bench 235%, 154,949 samples3x
RAM
M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70BH0- 128GBSamsungBench 96%, 8 samples3x
F3 DDR3 1600 C11 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 54%, 23 samples3x
M393B2G70QH0- 8x16GBSamsungBench 96%, 50 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $170
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback