Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8120 25,690 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 76.8 1-Core 53.1 2-Core 92.8 48% 74.2 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 323 30% 253 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 63%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 180 182 182 179 176 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Read 431 Write 372 Mixed 346 SusWrite 205 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 36.6 128% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 271 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 241 184% 249 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 466GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 101 100 101 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 82.5 Write 84.1 Mixed 72.1 SusWrite 101 63% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-478.A00LF 2x4GB 351 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.7% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 12.5 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 7 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 86.7 46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 70%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	85x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	55x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	50x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $358

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16