Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 92 1-Core 95.8 2-Core 188 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 369 49% 366 Pts	64-Core 338 21% 338 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 510 2,450 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0967) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 392.0 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM871 2.5 7mm 256GB 1,320 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMM02D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 245 241 243 239 238 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Read 478 Write 336 Mixed 304 SusWrite 243 76% 340 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 32.6 109% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 297 225% 307 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	45.4% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 14.5 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 15.1 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	107x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	82x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	68x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	17x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	12x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	12x

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $225

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16