Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Gigabyte H110M-DS2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170609
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '18 at 04:33
Run Duration	107 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 93.8 1-Core 111 2-Core 218 81% 141 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 311 41% 306 Pts	64-Core 311 19% 311 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Asus(1043 2015) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.8.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Lighting 30.8 Reflection 34.4 Parallax 34.5 25% 33.2 fps	MRender 30.5 Gravity 24.2 Splatting 39.9 27% 31.5 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 23%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2400 C15 Series 2x4GB 4,971 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 33.3 MC Mixed 25.3 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 33.7 SC Mixed 25.4 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 60.3 66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	302x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	168x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	145x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	45x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	31x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	27x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16