Lenovo 20JJS41800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20JJS41800  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20JJS41800
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '18 at 01:29
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 80.6
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 111
54% 85.1 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 157
23% 166 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 5061) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.29% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 3.12
Parallax 1.41
1% 2.07 fps
MRender 2.76
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 0.09
1% 1.55 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.29%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1001 128GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4133001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 407
Write 235
Mixed 197
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 22.4
99% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 204
170% 250 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.9% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 7.5
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback