PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 18E7 |
Memory | 1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20131217 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Sep 18 '18 at 16:37 |
Run Duration | 228 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
76.1%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 340.84
|
3.2%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 74 89 83 78 80 MB/s
|
39%
Below average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6
15GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.2 9 8.6 8.1 8.8 MB/s
|
10.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
31%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 1,014x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 847x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 310x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 979x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 331x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 224x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $105 |