Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 09 '16 at 11:37
Run Duration	109 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 7,521 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Memory 72.3 1-Core 49.1 2-Core 127 50% 82.9 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 477 38% 333 Pts	64-Core 1026 64% 1026 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Gigabyte(1458 254D) 3GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	18.3% Very poor	Lighting 33.9 Reflection 30.6 Parallax 54.9 28% 39.8 fps	MRender 0.14 Gravity 0.1 Splatting 0.13 0% 0.12 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 39%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 268GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 221GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x8GB 5,342 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM RAM Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 51.3 MC Write 40.9 MC Mixed 40.3 126% 44.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 9.5 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 96.2 42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 145%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16