Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	69% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81 342,244 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	46.6% Average	Memory 70.7 1-Core 60.5 2-Core 102 49% 77.7 Pts	4-Core 131 8-Core 142 18% 136 Pts	64-Core 140 9% 140 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69% Good	Lighting 78.1 Reflection 109 Parallax 105 64% 97.2 fps	MRender 94.9 Gravity 97.6 Splatting 97.9 79% 96.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 88%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 475 Write 452 Mixed 352 95% 426 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 62.6 4K Mixed 40.9 139% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 316 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 224 186% 268 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 9GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 466 Write 455 Mixed 379 97% 434 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 75.5 4K Mixed 48.8 158% 53.6 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 303 236% 325 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x8GB 17,846 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	46.6% Average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 17.1 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 13.6 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 99.8 40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	64x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	49x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	49x

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $595

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16