HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Z600 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AE8h
Memory	13 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160224
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '18 at 19:06
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	SYC-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5550 1,356 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	59% Above average	Memory 68.8 1-Core 73.9 2-Core 137 55% 93.2 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 444 43% 355 Pts	64-Core 732 45% 732 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.1 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.9% Average	Lighting 52.7 Reflection 63.3 Parallax 68.7 43% 61.6 fps	MRender 64.4 Gravity 50.3 Splatting 53.9 46% 56.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 128GB 4,859 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 206 187 198 196 185 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.3% Good	Read 248 Write 105 Mixed 206 SusWrite 196 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 53.5 4K Mixed 30.2 100% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 105 96% 144 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 99%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25 53,598 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 315GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 121 119 118 121 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 61.1 Write 62.3 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 120 48% 66 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 87%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41 7,860 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 298GB free Firmware: MK7O SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 40 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 123 Write 40.3 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 39.7 43% 58.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:01 98 9965525-008.A00LF ID:01 98 9965525-033.A00LF ID:01 98 9965525-033.A00LF ID:01 98 9965525-033.A00LF 50GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.8% Below average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 13 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 8.2 22% 7.9 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	297x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	272x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	252x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	143x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	130x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	123x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	97x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	52x
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples	36x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16