Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5650 13,757 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 66.1 2-Core 128 60% 95.1 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 348 38% 298 Pts	64-Core 466 29% 466 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 432GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 249 243 215 248 234 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	71% Very good	Read 258 Write 245 Mixed 216 SusWrite 238 54% 239 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 57 4K Mixed 36 120% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 197 147% 195 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 44 45 41 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 10 Write 8 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 41.2 15% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 85% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 MXIC 25L8005 41GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 33 MHz 8192, 33792 MB Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	39.6% Below average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12.4 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 10.2 27% 9.33 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
MXIC 25L8005 41GBUnknownBench 36%, 466 samples	193x
MXIC 25L8005 37GBUnknownBench 37%, 309 samples	87x
25L8005 1x33GBMXICBench 23%, 218 samples	55x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16