Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 5% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N2600 2,255 User benchmarks, average bench 22% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Memory 42.8 1-Core 5.4 2-Core 8.6 16% 18.9 Pts	4-Core 18.9 8-Core 20.6 3% 19.8 Pts	64-Core 22.6 1% 22.6 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 25%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3600 1,010 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 0624) Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.8.1075 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.29% Terrible	Lighting 0.53 Reflection 0.46 Parallax 0.41 0% 0.47 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.29% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 258GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 49 39 45 44 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	24.8% Poor	Read 43.5 Write 28.5 Mixed 11.5 SusWrite 43.1 23% 31.6 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0 13% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMT3010EF48E7W1333 1x1GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 1 of 2 slots used 1GB SODIMM DDR3 666 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	9.86% Terrible	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3 10% 3.57 GB/s	SC Read 0 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 0.1 2% 0.53 GB/s	Latency 190 21% 190 ns
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.86% Great: 11%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16