Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-7500 APU (2014 M.Ka) 4,105 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket FP3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Memory 52.1 1-Core 57.9 2-Core 85.6 40% 65.2 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 123 17% 125 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 3,765 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Acer(1025 0864) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.5.1 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.25% Terrible	Lighting 4.57 Reflection 6.5 Parallax 6.66 4% 5.91 fps	MRender 6.29 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 7.74 5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.25% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500120G 120GB 4,749 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RA SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 65 68 69 69 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 357 Write 313 Mixed 255 SusWrite 79.9 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 18.6 4K Mixed 15.7 54% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 22.5 DQ Write 24.3 DQ Mixed 13.6 13% 20.1 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CM0-CK0 Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.1% Poor	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 12.2 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 8.5 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 153 26% 153 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 5,093 samples	28x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,765 samples	11x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 1,187 samples	9x

RAM
ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 45%, 3,225 samples	7x
ACR16D3LS1KNG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 5,164 samples	5x
ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 6,155 samples	4x

Value: 13% - Very poor

Total price: $100

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16