| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS_W550 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3417-A2 |
| Memory | 12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160628 |
| Uptime | 2.2 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 15 '18 at 17:28 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | MLI-User |
| Background CPU | 35% |
PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
75.8%
Very good
|
80% 142 Pts
|
61% 504 Pts
|
40% 641 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.33
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
18% 19.5 fps
|
17% 21.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-00000 256GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 144 145 141 148 156 MB/s
|
82.1%
Excellent
|
50% 226 MB/s
|
148% 58.7 MB/s
|
149% 233 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 180 179 181 180 183 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
109% 148 MB/s
|
204% 1.47 MB/s
| |
|
TOSHIBA USB FLASH DRIVE 64GB
48GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 15 11 12 12 MB/s
|
9.67%
Terrible
|
30% 24.4 MB/s
|
24% 2.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
40.5%
Average
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
35% 12.4 GB/s
|
53% 76 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS_W550 Builds (Compare 91 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS_W550
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 30x |
| Xeon E3-1245 v5IntelBench 76%, 2,081 samples | 22x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples | 11x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 10x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $350 |