| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG NP350E7C-S07FR |
| Memory | 3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130704 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 15 '18 at 03:01 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 62% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
53.2%
Above average
|
48% 78.6 Pts
|
27% 201 Pts
|
12% 199 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D8) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
|
2.18%
Terrible
|
2% 2.41 fps
|
3% 3.01 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JE4OA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 41 27 4.2 3.8 4.3 MB/s
|
29%
Poor
|
40% 54.3 MB/s
|
95% 0.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5773EB0-CK0 M471B5273EB0-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
|
44.2%
Average
|
48% 16.6 GB/s
|
22% 7.57 GB/s
|
41% 97 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC Builds (Compare 608 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 157x |
| Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples | 154x |
| Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples | 115x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 536x |
| HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples | 37x |
| Radeon HD 7600MAMDBench 4%, 7,895 samples | 19x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $81 |