PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock H87 Performance (all builds) |
Memory | 12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130703 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 15 '18 at 01:35 |
Run Duration | 278 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
88.3%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
57.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 526ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 137 137 126 140 141 MB/s
|
75.2%
Very good
|
|||
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
81GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 87 85 92 90 101 MB/s
|
68.8%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$60
546GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 100 94 96 98 MB/s
|
60.5%
Good
|
|||
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
21GB free
Firmware: CP100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 51 50 51 51 MB/s
|
27.8%
Poor
|
|||
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 3TB
545GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 150 141 143 148 141 MB/s
|
57.1%
Above average
|
|||
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 3TB
140GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 181 182 189 164 180 MB/s
|
68.2%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
62.7%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4670Intel $54Bench 66%, 49,019 samples | 65x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 63x |
Core i5-4670KIntel $64Bench 68%, 128,482 samples | 53x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 42x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 37x |
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 21x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $422 |