Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 106% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF (all builds)
Memory	29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180625
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '18 at 22:42
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 81.2 1-Core 128 2-Core 251 84% 153 Pts	4-Core 496 8-Core 915 84% 706 Pts	64-Core 1,418 88% 1,418 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6687) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Lighting 155 Reflection 160 Parallax 136 126% 150 fps	MRender 125 Gravity 149 Splatting 116 105% 130 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 452GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1757 1646 1674 1612 1612 1608 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	314% Outstanding	Read 2,206 Write 1,676 Mixed 1,026 SusWrite 1,652 367% 1,640 MB/s	4K Read 49.6 4K Write 171 4K Mixed 70.8 256% 97.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,089 DQ Write 977 DQ Mixed 974 746% 1,013 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 314% Great: 353%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 456GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1884 1886 1884 1886 1814 1795 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	336% Outstanding	Read 2,329 Write 1,867 Mixed 1,073 SusWrite 1,858 399% 1,782 MB/s	4K Read 49.2 4K Write 184 4K Mixed 70.2 262% 101 MB/s	DQ Read 1,172 DQ Write 1,054 DQ Mixed 1,056 808% 1,094 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 336% Great: 353%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 201 200 199 199 201 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 167 Mixed 90.1 SusWrite 200 119% 163 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 114%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 15GB free, PID 00e2 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.9 3.8 4 3.9 3.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	1.4% Terrible	Read 3.8 Write 3.5 Mixed 6.3 SusWrite 3.9 6% 4.38 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.4% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	93% Outstanding	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 54.9 MC Mixed 27 105% 36.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 22.3 SC Mixed 10 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	38x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	22x
Core i9-7940XIntel $815Bench 83%, 4,560 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	15x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	12x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	9x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 12,020 samples	8x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	8x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	5x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	21x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	17x
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $775

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)