Foxconn P4M900-8237A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 7% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Foxconn P4M900-8237A (all builds)
Memory	0.2 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080818
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '18 at 20:44
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4500-$130 8,675 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	Memory 59 1-Core 13.8 2-Core 21.1 25% 31.3 Pts	4-Core 36.7 8-Core 30 5% 33.3 Pts	64-Core 42 3% 42 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2400-PRO 2,899 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.902.0.0 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.73 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 0.47 1% 0.9 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 1.22 1% 0.81 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB 28,774 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 436GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 42 43 49 16 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 101 Write 90.5 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 43.5 47% 65 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 81% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 82%
Samsung HD080HJ 72GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 67GB free Firmware: ZH100-41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 58 59 59 59 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.3% Below average	Read 56.8 Write 63.8 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 59 40% 54.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 166% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x0.5GB 3,675 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 2 of 2 slots used 1GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	8.62% Terrible	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.77 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 0 SC Mixed 0.5 1% 0.2 GB/s	Latency 131 31% 131 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.62% Great: 15%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P4M900-8237A Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn P4M900-8237A

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	3x
Pentium Dual E2200Intel $54Bench 33%, 8,325 samples	2x
Pentium Dual E2160Intel $47Bench 32%, 4,697 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	3x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	1x
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow V+200 Series 60GBKingstonBench 64%, 127 samples	1x
SSD 120GBLonglineBench 65%, 271 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	4x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	2x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16