HP 700-106eo

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics66.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHP 700-106eo  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130919
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 14 '18 at 20:34
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-4440-$228
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
61% Good
SC Int 91.3
SC Float 93.5
SC Mixed 91.5
74% 92.1 Pts
QC Int 289
QC Float 288
QC Mixed 300
66% 292 Pts
MC Int 357
MC Float 344
MC Mixed 356
53% 352 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$220
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
66.6% Good
Lighting 210
Reflection 180
Parallax 189
63% 193 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 192
Splatting 156
70% 163 fps
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 72%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$108
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2306RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 215 168 72 53 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 475
Write 286
Mixed 210
SusWrite 131
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 31.2
118% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28.5
DQ Write 72.8
DQ Mixed 124
74% 75.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
542GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 133 132 133 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 106
Write 107
Mixed 73
SusWrite 132
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 106%
Toshiba MK5061GSYN 500GB-$75
230GB free
Firmware: MH000D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 53 50 52 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 75.5
Write 58.7
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 52.3
39% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$66
260GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 86 86 85 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 101
Write 6.7
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 86.1
47% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
26GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 2.8 4.4 4.1 3.7 4.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
7.86% Terrible
Read 28.8
Write 4
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 4.1
13% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
57% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.86%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5173BH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 13.7
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 700-106eo Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: HP 700-106eo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $336
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $349Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $269Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $115
Intel Core i5-8600K $260AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $145SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $155SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback