Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '18 at 20:20
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$174
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 90.3
1-Core 129
2-Core 255
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 723
77% 614 Pts
64-Core 741
46% 741 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.8.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Lighting 68.8
Reflection 68
Parallax 94.5
56% 77.1 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 65.3
Splatting 57.2
52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 280 278 284 290 282 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 268
Mixed 278
SusWrite 281
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 34.6
151% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 222
186% 271 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
464GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 131 133 132 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 134
Write 128
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 131
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 88%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.2 3.3 3 3 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
2.02% Terrible
Read 7
Write 4.3
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3.1
6% 4.65 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 2.02%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 Kingston KHX2133C14/8G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.8
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,030
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback