PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus X99-E (all builds) |
Memory | 25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160608 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 14 '18 at 18:44 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
81.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2266 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.7
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 841E) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 82 81 80 82 MB/s
|
97%
Outstanding
|
|||
74.4%
Very good
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 73 75 76 76 MB/s
|
68.1%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
67.8%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 270x |
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 88x |
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples | 64x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 100x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 59x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 40x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $603 |