Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel To be filled by O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150921
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '18 at 10:46
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 550-$110 19,058 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	51% Above average	Memory 67.6 1-Core 80.7 2-Core 156 58% 101 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 200 27% 200 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8572) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.04% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 4.38 Parallax 4.41 4% 4.56 fps	MRender 4.62 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.04% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 370GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA7S0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 86 59 94 148 147 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	73.8% Very good	Read 146 Write 132 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 111 75% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 320GB-$54 6,728 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 198GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 82 83 83 79 80 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 75.3 Write 77.8 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 81.8 52% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 15GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 9.4 8.5 9 8.8 9.1 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 5.3 Mixed 14 SusWrite 8.1 16% 15 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 3.3 213% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 0, 0 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	29.5% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 12.8 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 7.7 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	109x
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	43x
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	38x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	95x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	55x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	49x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	14x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	9x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	257x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	92x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16