Asus PRIME H270-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics63.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 14 '18 at 03:01
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 253
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 709
71% 580 Pts
64-Core 699
43% 699 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85C5) ≥ 4GB; asus geforce gtx 1060 dc2 6gb
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.9% Good
Lighting 80.2
Reflection 81.1
Parallax 77.3
65% 79.5 fps
MRender 73.1
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 76
61% 74.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,048
Write 1,481
Mixed 717
311% 1,415 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 62.6
283% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,076
DQ Write 1269
DQ Mixed 720
668% 1,022 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
479GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 466 469 466 472 472 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 472
Mixed 452
SusWrite 468
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 60.2
200% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 349
265% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Galax TA1D0240A 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: SBFM11.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 91 92 90 92 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 490
Write 405
Mixed 358
SusWrite 124
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 39
156% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 206
185% 280 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 89%
OCZ Vector 512GB-$400
403GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 465 468 469 469 463 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 465
Mixed 300
SusWrite 467
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 38.4
163% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 238
212% 320 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
461GB free
Firmware: GG2OACA0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 72 79 77 75 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 72.5
Write 82.2
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 74.7
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB-$169
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.6% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.6
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 23.5
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H270-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270-PLUS - $3,094

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $3,464
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback