Monster TULPAR T7 V7.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics39.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 61% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V7.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V7.1
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160824
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 13 '18 at 13:15
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 20%
CPU Throttled 61%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 41.1
2-Core 97.1
40% 65.9 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 269
27% 218 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 6B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 389.27
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.1% Below average
Lighting 51.2
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 42.8
42% 35.5 fps
MRender 8.38
Gravity 48.8
Splatting 58
34% 38.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 281 270 232 282 287 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 386
Write 376
Mixed 324
SusWrite 273
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 20.2
75% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 122%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
815GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 128 125 127 127 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 128
Write 123
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 125
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 75%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.5 3.2 3.1 2.9 3.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 17.1
Write 1.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3
6% 6.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.4
137% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix GKE160SO102408-2400 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 12.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V7.1 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V7.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback