MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics89.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive318% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B45
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '18 at 08:36
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 139
2-Core 267
94% 167 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 814
84% 679 Pts
64-Core 802
50% 802 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Lighting 115
Reflection 118
Parallax 101
94% 111 fps
MRender 97.3
Gravity 101
Splatting 103
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1853 909 619 620 611 618 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,537
Write 2,364
Mixed 1,343
SusWrite 872
397% 1,779 MB/s
4K Read 67.2
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 89.8
304% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,851
DQ Write 1,253
DQ Mixed 1,475
1,122% 1,526 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 318%
Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
232GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 274 274 274 275 274 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 304
Mixed 373
SusWrite 296
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 58.2
206% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 231
209% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 118%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
232GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 278 278 279 278 283 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 297
Mixed 316
SusWrite 300
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 58.6
204% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 234
210% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 118%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
112GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 134 133 134 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 342
Mixed 327
SusWrite 167
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 54.2
200% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 169
178% 293 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
25GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 11 9.4 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 97.2
Write 21.5
Mixed 34
SusWrite 10.6
43% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
91% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 28%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
23GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 9.1 11 9.4 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 93.7
Write 11.2
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 10.8
33% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
82% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20%
Great: 28%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 500GB
334GB free, PID 2101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 37
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 38.9
46% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 28.2
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 30
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 52.9
76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) Builds (Compare 3,944 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $964
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback