MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics90.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive322% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B45
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '18 at 20:37
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 96.9
1-Core 156
2-Core 312
103% 188 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 930
95% 768 Pts
64-Core 927
57% 927 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 105%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 119
Parallax 101
94% 112 fps
MRender 97.7
Gravity 102
Splatting 103
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2178 684 616 617 622 620 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
322% Outstanding
Read 2,554
Write 2,391
Mixed 1,332
SusWrite 889
400% 1,792 MB/s
4K Read 67.3
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 91.9
310% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1867
DQ Write 1271
DQ Mixed 1,449
1,114% 1,529 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 322%
Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
232GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 274 276 274 275 275 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 490
Mixed 411
SusWrite 296
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 58
211% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 232
209% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 120%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
232GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 279 279 277 278 278 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 490
Mixed 402
SusWrite 300
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 58.5
212% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 228
208% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 120%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
112GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 133 133 133 132 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 396
Mixed 362
SusWrite 166
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 55.2
208% 76 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 166
179% 297 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 111%
Great: 108%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
25GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.9 11 9.5 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 97.3
Write 21.5
Mixed 34
SusWrite 10.6
43% 40.9 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
92% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 28%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
23GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 11 10 10 9.7 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 92.3
Write 8.2
Mixed 17
SusWrite 10.8
30% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1.3
86% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 28%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 500GB
334GB free, PID 2101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 37.5
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 39.1
47% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 28.3
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 30.7
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 50.5
79% 50.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) Builds (Compare 3,941 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $990
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback