| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Medion Erazer X5399 E/B529 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | MEDION MS-7848 |
| Memory | 9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141106 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 12 '18 at 19:27 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
76.9%
Very good
|
78% 136 Pts
|
58% 477 Pts
|
36% 589 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Elitegroup(1019 1029) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.6%
Average
|
49% 60.9 fps
|
48% 59.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung MZ7LF128HCHP-00000 128GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT0101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 48 50 45 34 26 MB/s
|
52.2%
Above average
|
44% 200 MB/s
|
87% 27.2 MB/s
|
48% 80.9 MB/s
|
|
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
583GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 134 136 137 136 134 MB/s
|
73.2%
Very good
|
77% 105 MB/s
|
190% 1.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
56.9%
Above average
|
56% 19.7 GB/s
|
50% 17.6 GB/s
|
56% 71.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Erazer X5399 E/B529 Builds (Compare 7 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Medion Erazer X5399 E/B529
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Good | Total price: $335 |