MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics90.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive322% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B45
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '18 at 17:23
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 96.8
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 895
93% 746 Pts
64-Core 884
55% 884 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 104%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 120
Parallax 101
94% 112 fps
MRender 97.3
Gravity 102
Splatting 102
82% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2153 700 620 620 618 616 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
322% Outstanding
Read 2,538
Write 2,391
Mixed 1,394
SusWrite 888
402% 1,803 MB/s
4K Read 67.2
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 91.9
310% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,864
DQ Write 1,279
DQ Mixed 1,575
1,175% 1,572 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 322%
Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
232GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 274 274 274 274 274 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 484
Mixed 341
SusWrite 296
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 58.2
212% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 217
202% 314 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 120%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
232GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 277 278 278 277 275 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 482
Mixed 346
SusWrite 299
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 59.4
214% 77.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 222
205% 316 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 121%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
112GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 133 133 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 397
Mixed 357
SusWrite 166
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 55.3
210% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 168
179% 296 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 111%
Great: 108%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
25GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 9 11 9.5 9.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
20% Poor
Read 94.5
Write 14
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 10.5
37% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
86% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20%
Great: 28%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
23GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 9.8 11 9.1 11 9.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 92.5
Write 8.2
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 10.6
28% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.3
89% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 28%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 500GB
334GB free, PID 2101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 38
Mixed 25
SusWrite 38.8
47% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 28
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 41.2
SC Mixed 27.7
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 51
78% 51 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) Builds (Compare 3,942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $964
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback