Gigabyte GA-M68MT-S2

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-M68MT-S2 (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110826
Uptime	12.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '18 at 01:53
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4100-$110 32,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Memory 83.8 1-Core 61.5 2-Core 109 54% 84.7 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 187 26% 190 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670 32,193 User benchmarks, average bench 6% PwrHis(1787 2309) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	5.38% Terrible	Lighting 7.1 Reflection 7.27 Parallax 6.94 6% 7.1 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 5.57 5% 5.57 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.38% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS90 0 120GB SSD 423 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS90 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 110 27 59 29 57 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.4% Average	Read 239 Write 116 Mixed 140 SusWrite 63.9 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 35.7 4K Mixed 21.5 82% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 30.5 DQ Write 48 DQ Mixed 29 25% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 86%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA 500GB 2,251 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 398GB free Firmware: JP2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 124 Write 10.2 Mixed 17 SusWrite 10.9 30% 40.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 103% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 72%
PNY USB3.0FD 32GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 22GB free, PID 00ea Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.9 4.5 6.2 5.6 6.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	6.61% Terrible	Read 28 Write 21.5 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 5.3 18% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.3 32% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.61% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	44% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 16.1 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 12.7 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-M68MT-S2 Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-M68MT-S2

CPU
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples	31x
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	15x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	13x

GPU
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	18x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	8x
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
SU 630 240GBAdataBench 62%, 346 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	96x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	21x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $138

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16