Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Performance (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130117
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '18 at 23:04
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 102 2-Core 195 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 506 52% 419 Pts	64-Core 508 31% 508 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 2304) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.8.2 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37% Below average	Lighting 43.2 Reflection 54.7 Parallax 59.6 35% 52.5 fps	MRender 57 Gravity 43.2 Splatting 49 40% 49.7 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 108 222 227 226 225 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.3% Good	Read 241 Write 221 Mixed 219 SusWrite 206 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 46 4K Mixed 31.5 104% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 194 145% 193 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 124%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 169GB free Firmware: Z32070RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 116 87 93 96 96 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.8% Average	Read 200 Write 223 Mixed 110 SusWrite 104 36% 159 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 58.8 4K Mixed 15.4 72% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 24.5 54% 111 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 86%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 124 124 125 126 126 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 122 Write 88 Mixed 85.5 SusWrite 124 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-442.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-442.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.2% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 15.1 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 16.3 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	8x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	7x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	7x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $295

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16