Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970A-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '18 at 13:16
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 48
2-Core 98.6
50% 76.4 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 197
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
MSI(1462 2601) 1GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Lighting 23
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 20.4
19% 23.4 fps
MRender 30.1
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 24.7
21% 26.1 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 352 371 273 259 277 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 437
Mixed 446
SusWrite 299
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 52.1
174% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 169
139% 201 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 129%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
6GB free
Firmware: X2316RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 387
Write 178
Mixed 104
49% 223 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 28.7
116% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 98.4
DQ Mixed 31.6
34% 53.8 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 91%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
1GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
4.64% Terrible
Read 17.7
Write 10.5
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 2.7
10% 9.15 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.64%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C8 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.3% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $269
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback