Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	12.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5200-$50 13,848 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Memory 11.6 1-Core 34.8 2-Core 52.4 18% 32.9 Pts	4-Core 69.6 8-Core 71.7 9% 70.6 Pts	64-Core 72.1 4% 72.1 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 54 42 53 55 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 74.1 Write 57.1 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 49 14% 63.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 12.2 4K Mixed 4.1 16% 6.37 MB/s	DQ Read 24.3 DQ Write 66.1 DQ Mixed 29.9 27% 40.1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 69%
Kingston DTR30G2 16GB 551 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 3GB free, PID 16a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 17 19 22 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.91% Terrible	Read 19.9 Write 13.2 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 16.7 19% 14.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 40% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 8.91% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.7 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 2.9 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 389 10% 389 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium E5200Intel $50Bench 36%, 13,848 samples	20x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	13x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	10x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	9x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	8x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	8x

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $79

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16