Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Processor model unknown 104 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Memory 64.1 1-Core 37.3 2-Core 71.9 38% 57.8 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 164 22% 164 Pts	64-Core 165 10% 165 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240 11,020 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Zotac(19DA 1142) 512MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4195 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	4.65% Terrible	Lighting 6.27 Reflection 7.08 Parallax 2.59 5% 5.31 fps	MRender 6.38 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.65 4% 4.78 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.65% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45 22,057 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: O080 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.1% Average	Read 199 Write 113 Mixed 116 31% 142 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 26 4K Mixed 15.7 77% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 48.1 DQ Write 61.2 DQ Mixed 17.8 24% 42.4 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 91%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 32GB 319 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 4GB free, PID dd4a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	8.96% Terrible	Read 22.6 Write 8.87 Mixed 7.1 14% 12.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.37 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.73 70% 1.69 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.96% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.4% Poor	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 9.2 25% 8.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.7 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16