Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite C850-A811 (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120424
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '18 at 20:37
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225 51,836 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Memory 62.1 1-Core 49.8 2-Core 15.1 34% 42.3 Pts	4-Core 54.6 8-Core 106 10% 80.1 Pts	64-Core 93.2 6% 93.2 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M 7,895 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	5% Terrible	Lighting 6.47 Reflection 6.69 Parallax 5.38 5% 6.18 fps	MRender 5.76 Gravity 4.77 Splatting 5.74 4% 5.42 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40 17,642 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: ES2OA70K SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 39 41 55 61 51 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	Read 37.6 Write 21 Mixed 29.2 SusWrite 43.8 24% 32.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5773DH0-CH9 6GB 87 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	32.9% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 10 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 3.2 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16