Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5200U 107,407 User benchmarks, average bench 42% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	52.7% Above average	Memory 68.4 1-Core 79.9 2-Core 123 55% 90.4 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 216 29% 215 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 920M 11,731 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Dell(1028 0655) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9793 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	4.94% Terrible	Lighting 7.27 Reflection 7.27 Parallax 8.38 6% 7.64 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 7.5 Splatting 0.04 3% 4.21 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.94% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE3000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 8.3 21 22 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 352 Write 77.7 Mixed 109 SusWrite 17.3 30% 139 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 23 4K Mixed 1 45% 14.9 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 18 DQ Mixed 37.4 34% 55.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB 50,921 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 8.8 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 7.5 23% 7.9 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	830x
GeForce 820MNvidiaBench 4%, 9,266 samples	68x
GeForce 840MNvidiaBench 9%, 20,978 samples	62x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	165x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	152x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	71x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16