Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3060 2,183 User benchmarks, average bench 22% BGA 1170, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Memory 46.4 1-Core 24.5 2-Core 47.4 26% 39.4 Pts	4-Core 48.4 8-Core 47.9 6% 48.2 Pts	64-Core 46.5 3% 46.5 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 22B1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 3.19 Parallax 2.78 2% 2.66 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 1.97 Splatting 4.48 3% 3.18 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GB 4,377 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30200P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 120 118 119 118 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 343 Write 122 Mixed 139 SusWrite 118 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 27.6 4K Mixed 15.3 64% 20.9 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 87.8 DQ Mixed 95.5 72% 95.7 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8GB 259 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 6.2 19% 6.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium J3710IntelBench 27%, 2,453 samples	4x
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	3x
Pentium N3700IntelBench 26%, 11,299 samples	3x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	11x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	2x

SSD
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	3x
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBMicronBench 22%, 5,693 samples	10x
8GBMicronBench 43%, 259 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16