Huanan X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Huanan X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170628
Uptime	18.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 03 '18 at 08:40
Run Duration	105 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2,104 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 90.3 2-Core 175 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 571 54% 449 Pts	64-Core 814 50% 814 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450 10,238 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B 7450) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.6% Terrible	Lighting 2.13 Reflection 2.19 Parallax 2 2% 2.11 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 1.63 Splatting 1.65 1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.6% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ190000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 39 98 104 97 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	28.9% Poor	Read 399 Write 187 Mixed 130 SusWrite 79.6 44% 199 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 4.3 28% 7.13 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170FHD- 4x4GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	MC Read 34.2 MC Write 33.2 MC Mixed 29.5 92% 32.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 10.8 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Huanan X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

CPU
Xeon E5-2680 v2IntelBench 71%, 1,619 samples	9x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	7x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	5x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	4x

SSD
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GBBench 71%, 36,832 samples	3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
M393B5170FH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 676 samples	5x
KRE-D3U1600M/ Dimm2_Manufacturer KRE-D3U1600M/ Dimm4_Manufacturer KRE-D3U1600M/ Dimm6_Manufacturer KRE-D3U1600M/ 16GBDimm0_ManufacturerBench 98%, 15 samples	5x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16