| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920x1080x4294967296 szín |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180309 |
| Uptime | 0.9 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 02 '18 at 23:06 |
| Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
| Run User | HUN-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.7%
Good
|
72% 119 Pts
|
32% 245 Pts
|
18% 299 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
26.9%
Poor
|
27% 36.4 fps
|
27% 32.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
410GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 88 87 87 87 MB/s
|
55.8%
Above average
|
65% 89 MB/s
|
161% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 167 172 178 178 176 MB/s
|
94%
Outstanding
|
96% 132 MB/s
|
150% 1.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FAD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.2%
Poor
|
22% 7.7 GB/s
|
21% 7.3 GB/s
|
58% 68.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,298 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 349x |
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 202x |
| Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 199x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 197x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 152x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 131x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $383 |