Performance Results


Gaming 139% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 128% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS X FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	60.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171017
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '18 at 08:01
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 95.7 1-Core 147 2-Core 268 96% 171 Pts	4-Core 595 8-Core 900 93% 747 Pts	64-Core 1,242 77% 1,242 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Lighting 186 Reflection 209 Parallax 187 152% 194 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 185 Splatting 133 121% 149 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141 42,930 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 347 352 354 348 349 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 364 Mixed 329 SusWrite 351 87% 390 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 44.1 160% 60.7 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 196 176% 263 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 103%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 232GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1362 307 307 307 308 308 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	228% Outstanding	Read 1,932 Write 1,471 Mixed 564 SusWrite 483 246% 1,113 MB/s	4K Read 45.3 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 62 233% 89 MB/s	DQ Read 1105 DQ Write 1,145 DQ Mixed 703 645% 984 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 228% Great: 236%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 143 145 146 146 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 156 Write 142 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 145 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR64GX4M4K3733C17 4x16GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 37.6 MC Write 40.2 MC Mixed 31.1 104% 36.3 GB/s	SC Read 22.4 SC Write 45.7 SC Mixed 25.5 89% 31.2 GB/s	Latency 54.8 73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 128%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 103%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	58x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	55x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	49x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	51x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	45x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	29x

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $942

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16