Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite T115D (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Satellite T115D
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091125
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 31 '18 at 19:26
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon Neo MV-40 216 User benchmarks, average bench 26% S1G1/BGA, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Memory 55.8 1-Core 9.8 2-Core 12 22% 25.9 Pts	4-Core 14.7 8-Core 13.7 2% 14.2 Pts	64-Core 21 1% 21 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200 5,730 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FFE2) 256MB Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.682.0.0 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	0.29% Terrible	Lighting 0.33 Reflection 0.08 Parallax 0.28 0% 0.23 fps	MRender 0.48 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.48 0% 0.38 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.29% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2555GSX 250GB-$77 5,017 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: FG00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 56 41 35 64 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	22% Poor	Read 32.6 Write 34.2 Mixed 11 SusWrite 44.1 22% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 27% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.88% Terrible	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.7 8% 2.9 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 1 SC Mixed 0.3 1% 0.47 GB/s	Latency 141 28% 141 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.88% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16