Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results


Gaming 109% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 99% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 (all builds)
Memory	40.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180321
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 31 '18 at 12:49
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Memory 92.5 1-Core 136 2-Core 267 92% 165 Pts	4-Core 541 8-Core 871 87% 706 Pts	64-Core 989 61% 989 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 370E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.31 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Lighting 144 Reflection 158 Parallax 148 117% 150 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 148 Splatting 117 104% 128 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89 9,651 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10362 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 114 97 93 88 84 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 249 Write 133 Mixed 137 SusWrite 98.9 34% 155 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 30.8 4K Mixed 13.7 62% 20.9 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 69.5 DQ Mixed 63.9 57% 87.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 48%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 518GB free Firmware: EXM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 337 360 370 371 368 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	99.5% Outstanding	Read 473 Write 451 Mixed 379 SusWrite 348 93% 413 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 90.5 4K Mixed 41.6 147% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 336 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 308 232% 310 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 46 47 46 47 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Read 49.7 Write 46.8 Mixed 36.9 SusWrite 46.7 33% 45 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 67%
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB 6,005 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 154GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 96 95 85 100 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 98.2 Write 91.1 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 93.8 64% 86.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 83%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296 5,447 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 485GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 121 116 122 127 118 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 113 Write 124 Mixed 58.9 SusWrite 122 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.9 210% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 118%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296 5,447 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2.5TB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 174 176 171 173 171 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 201 Mixed 85.2 SusWrite 173 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 267% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 118%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 216GB free Firmware: 1D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 105 106 106 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 95 Write 98.5 Mixed 94.4 SusWrite 106 73% 98.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 85%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296 5,447 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 111 117 111 103 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	77.3% Very good	Read 156 Write 197 Mixed 81 SusWrite 113 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1 250% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 3x16GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 3 of 8 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 41.7 MC Write 41.1 MC Mixed 36.7 114% 39.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 22.1 57% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $290

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	299x
Core i7-6950XIntel $499Bench 87%, 6,135 samples	246x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	129x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	181x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	175x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	63x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	47x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	36x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	20x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 96%, 3,140 samples	18x
Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 95%, 3,531 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $1,571

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16