PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S7 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D3099-A1 |
Memory | 44.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180222 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Aug 31 '18 at 11:45 |
Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2420 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
|
50.1%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8586) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
22.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 196 200 176 194 206 MB/s
|
61.3%
Good
|
|||
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 599GB
378GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 343 335 335 334 335 MB/s
|
113%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Samsung M393B1K70QB0- Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Samsung M393B1K70QB0- 48GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
56.3%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2407 01stBench 49%, 63 samples | 2x |
Xeon E5-2420 0IntelBench 58%, 1,039 samples | 1x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2450 01stBench 58%, 75 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 2x |
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 1x |
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 118% - Outstanding | Total price: $59 |