Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive351% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '18 at 04:03
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 25.5 GHz, turbo 25.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 93.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 632
65% 524 Pts
64-Core 827
51% 827 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 189
Reflection 202
Parallax 184
154% 192 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 188
Splatting 128
120% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 134%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2169 2191 2191 2086 2130 2133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
351% Outstanding
Read 2,431
Write 2,199
Mixed 1,304
SusWrite 2,150
454% 2,021 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 79.3
282% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 906
DQ Write 700
DQ Mixed 778
588% 794 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 351%
Great: 393%
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70
118GB free
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 443 438 418 439 435 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 438
Mixed 292
SusWrite 434
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 42.7
160% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 294
237% 336 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 110%
Great: 119%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 4.1 4 3.8 3.5 3.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
5.49% Terrible
Read 24.8
Write 5.2
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 3.6
11% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 39.4
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 21
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $923
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback