Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620 5,965 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 86.6 1-Core 65.7 2-Core 131 59% 94.4 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 480 42% 356 Pts	64-Core 617 38% 617 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 8C97) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Lighting 35.5 Reflection 25.9 Parallax 32.1 29% 31.1 fps	MRender 37.1 Gravity 33.2 Splatting 33 28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199 10,165 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 79 87 87 89 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 134 Write 144 Mixed 121 SusWrite 85.6 27% 121 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 40.7 4K Mixed 20.9 71% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 21 DQ Write 78.8 DQ Mixed 28 28% 42.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 66%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 180GB free Firmware: JP2OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 85 89 90 89 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	Read 87.2 Write 88.8 Mixed 49.7 SusWrite 88.7 58% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 76%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 8GB 4,577 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 2GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.8 4.1 4.2 4.1 4.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	7.74% Terrible	Read 24.7 Write 13.2 Mixed 15 SusWrite 4 17% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 2.4 123% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.74% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 40GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 34816 MB Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	42.6% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 14.7 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 8 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16