Asrock A88M-G/3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A88M-G/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20160114
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 27 '18 at 02:04
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467 11,295 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Memory 82 1-Core 75.2 2-Core 58.9 51% 72 Pts	4-Core 90.7 8-Core 98.9 12% 94.8 Pts	64-Core 103 6% 103 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85B6) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.6% Above average	Lighting 59.3 Reflection 72.2 Parallax 67.9 48% 66.5 fps	MRender 70 Gravity 69 Splatting 72.5 58% 70.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49 58,154 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 715 Write 505 Mixed 544 130% 588 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 98.6 4K Mixed 45 156% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 28.4 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 37.4 53% 91.9 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 157%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23 32,491 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 233GB free Firmware: HP73 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 136 Write 32.7 Mixed 64.8 58% 77.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB 632 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.4% Below average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 11.9 34% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 10 24% 8.43 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88M-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A88M-G/3.1

CPU
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples	18x
A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $889Bench 47%, 6,638 samples	13x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	11x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	19x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	6x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x

SSD
M.2 PCIe SSD 512GBSpccBench 203%, 29,096 samples	6x
T253X2001T 1TBTeamBench 75%, 11,283 samples	4x
WT200-128GB 128GBBench 59%, 21 samples	4x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI M378B5273DH0-CK0 Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 16GBSamsungBench 41%, 22 samples	7x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	4x
F3-2133C10-4GSR F3-2133C9-4GXL F3-2133C10-4GSR F3-2133C9-4GXL 16GBUnknownBench 36%, 9 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $175

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16