Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 26 '18 at 15:28
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 170
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 315
44% 322 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Lighting 49.7
Reflection 45.6
Parallax 40.7
40% 45.3 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 41.9
Splatting 37
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 126 111 99 106 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 310
Write 158
Mixed 197
SusWrite 112
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 13
68% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 88.3
DQ Mixed 29.2
40% 73.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 72%
Maxtor 6V200E0 204GB
5GB free
Firmware: VA111900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 39 35 34 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 33.5
Write 35.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 36.8
24% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.2
102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 37%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
373GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 138 141 140 142 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 137
Write 101
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 140
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.1% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 13.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $666
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback