PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 2.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | LORD G4x 775 ICH7 8712 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20160430 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 26 '18 at 09:16 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | IDN-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
|
40%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
|
2.62%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung HM251HI 250GB-$50
100GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 57 57 57 57 MB/s
|
27.1%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 25 51 55 58 58 MB/s
|
14.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown V-GeN D3K2GL1600K 4GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
|
18.7%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 21x |
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 12x |
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 67x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 13x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $117 |