Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 25 '18 at 21:08
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 134
62% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 438
41% 342 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 3004) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.8.1
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
37% Below average
Lighting 48.3
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 60.4
39% 46.9 fps
MRender 30.9
Gravity 47.3
Splatting 40.2
33% 39.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 282 284 293 294 294 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 419
Mixed 348
SusWrite 301
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 52.6
170% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 261
196% 261 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
350GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 74 74 74 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 76.7
Write 69.3
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 71.9
47% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 83%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
1TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 127 126 127 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 127
Write 133
Mixed 58
SusWrite 127
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 72%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
329GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 98 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 101
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 99.3
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
247GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 87 89 91 90 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 91.3
Write 81.6
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 89.5
62% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 17.7
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13.9
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback