Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3217U 28,188 User benchmarks, average bench 43% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	36.5% Below average	Memory 62 1-Core 19.3 2-Core 36 29% 39.1 Pts	4-Core 67.5 8-Core 66.8 9% 67.2 Pts	64-Core 60.9 4% 60.9 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 379GB free (System drive) Firmware: GG2OA6C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 68 71 72 57 64 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 69.2 Write 68 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 65.6 42% 57.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 58%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 11GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.2 2.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	4.87% Terrible	Read 22.7 Write 1.7 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 2.5 7% 7.78 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.87% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G4E1 1x4GB 1,492 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 7.7 23% 8.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	127x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	30x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G4E1 1x4GBMicronBench 23%, 1,492 samples	76x
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 25%, 6,552 samples	71x
4KTF25664HZ-1G4E1 1x2GBMicronBench 20%, 230 samples	7x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16