Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 24 '18 at 08:23
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 52.8
2-Core 109
53% 82.6 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 337
35% 283 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
EVGA(3842 1373) 1GB
CLim: 763 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 18.9
Parallax 14.5
13% 16.5 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 19
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 101 102 91 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
58% Above average
Read 246
Write 129
Mixed 172
SusWrite 99.6
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 33.2
120% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 91.8
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 103
80% 108 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58%
Great: 73%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
1TB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 103 104 103 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 89.3
Write 79.8
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 102
111% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.8
179% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 51%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
13GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.9 3.3 5 4.7 5.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
3.99% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 0.3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4.2
6% 6.07 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.99%
Great: 10%
Prolific USB-SATA Bridge 2TB
153GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 78 79 79 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
28% Poor
Read 65
Write 82.7
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 78.9
87% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.9% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 11.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.1
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback