| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Gigabyte Z370 HD3 |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte Z370 HD3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170906 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 22 '18 at 18:00 |
| Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
88.1%
Excellent
|
93% 174 Pts
|
71% 531 Pts
|
32% 512 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 1952 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
|
34.9%
Below average
|
37% 38.5 fps
|
31% 38.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 120GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 82 82 82 80 78 MB/s
|
113%
Outstanding
|
80% 360 MB/s
|
227% 82.9 MB/s
|
244% 337 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
145GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 131 133 132 133 MB/s
|
76.3%
Very good
|
87% 119 MB/s
|
221% 1.57 MB/s
| |
|
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB
4GB free, PID 1603
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7.4 7.3 7.4 7.4 7.1 MB/s
|
6.43%
Terrible
|
11% 9.62 MB/s
|
29% 2.6 MB/s
| |
|
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7.3 9.3 9.4 8.6 9.3 MB/s
|
6.1%
Terrible
|
11% 9.7 MB/s
|
20% 1.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FH 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.9%
Average
|
42% 14.8 GB/s
|
33% 11.7 GB/s
|
54% 74.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-Z370 HD3-CF Builds (Compare 3,514 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 HD3 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples | 709x |
| Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 698x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 545x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 368x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 243x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 213x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $612 |